Most business owners believe moving their company database to the cloud is a noble pursuit. There is a strong rationale backing this belief. When a business leverages cloud computing distributed benefits, this makes it possible for them to enjoy higher scalability, availability, and a lesser dependence upon on-site hardware. The biggest advantage of them all is cloud computing promises reduced costs offering improved resources and processing power at affordable flat prices.
Cases where migration to the cloud is not a wise affair
In truth, for some businesses moving to cloud computing is not always the affordable panacea. It is expected in the future to be. There are several cases where moving to the cloud has caused more complications and headaches for the company before its migration. This has caused new concerns and questions to crop up about cloud computing and whether it is a feasible solution for all companies in every business niche?
Simple solutions give way to long-term problems
From the above, it is evident that what might have seemed a simple solution for the company has turned out to be a long-term challenging business problem. Credible DBAs and IT professionals in database management caution that before migrating to the cloud, it is prudent for every business owner to assess the specific needs of their company. They should be weighed against conventional options before a final decision is taken.
Primary issue companies face
One of the key issues that companies face when they move to the cloud is the disconnect between the actual price of the service and its anticipated costs. For those SLAs with widely known services like Microsoft Azure or Amazon Web Services, or AWS, business owners believe they are paying for the specific processing power their companies need. However, in reality, these businesses should consider their costs for storage. While dealing with the database or databases, their disk space costs too that singly can be extremely prohibitive.
Likewise, there are similar discrepancies in costs when the performance of the database is considered. When an organization needs higher capabilities for their database’s high performance, for instance, a cloud computing platform like Azure or AWS will stringently enforce limits on performance for the capabilities you pay for. Suppose you compare them to conventional solutions, where a 15,000 IOPS project can burst a little yet be managed by the hardware in your company. In that case, cloud computing will immediately degrade the performance without bursting.
When should you not scale your database on the cloud?
Experts in the field of database administration and management, research states that one of the most frustrating cases associated with a general solution often promised by cloud service providers is scalability. Scaling database operations on the cloud are indeed simple as per the dynamic requirements of the organization. However, in most case scenarios, companies land upscaling up and not down. There are promises made when it comes to the ability to scale back. This might result in huge cost savings for the business in the future. However, most organizations land up wanting more scale and power, leading to a much higher cost of operations.
What should businesses do?
When it comes to considering the expensive downsides of moving to the cloud, it is vital for the enterprise to completely understand its need, desire, and the potential costs of this migration. For instance, the cloud service provider might provide the enterprise about 99.9% availability via an SLA; however, your company might need about 3 to 4 extra nines for optimal performance. Check the different vendors and find which is offering you the best services. It will help you select the best for your business.
This means the operations of the cloud database might be stable; however, this will not mean that it is immune to any outage; for instance, the disruption of critical business information for indefinite periods. This is not the same as taking a database backup on your computer systems that give you full access to physical hardware in the event of disaster recovery. There are cases of cloud database backup and procedures for restoration being thwarted by a server that cannot be reached.
So, if cloud computing is not feasible for you, what should you do?
When it comes to the value and the optimal performance of your business database, bare metal system solutions score the highest in data backup and business information. Even if you have an outdated MacBook Pro, it can effectively sync in with the performance of the m5.xlarge environment of AWS at around one-fifth of the cost. Businesses must note that cloud computing is inevitably a popular and simple choice; however, it can increase the operation cost without any major improvement in system performance.
When it comes to accounting for disaster recovery, traditional computer systems also offer instant access to hardware that can completely restore business operations. If the cloud region dips, even if you pay for persistent storage, you stay at the mercy of the cloud computing service provider for restoring the access to the instance where the power is reduced. Here, as a business owner, you have two open choices- wait until the access is restored, or you need to restore operations from the on-site computer systems you have. If redundancy is crucial for your business, cloud operations will need an investment in extra methods for backups that will incur additional operations costs for you in the future.
Though there are several reasons why cloud computing deployments are valuable for business endeavors like moving the organization to an environment with DevOps, you must compare both the performance and the costs of cloud service providers to traditional cloud metal solutions. Experienced DBAs in the field of database management solutions and IT specialists advise your business accounts for both performance and availability first. In some cases, bare metal solutions offer you a significant improvement in performance over cloud computing providers at a fraction of the expense- so choose wisely.